By Joe Vandehey
The ball valve has been a mainstay of industrial water treatment for 50 years. Originally invented for use in firefighting systems aboard U.S. Navy vessels, the ball valve was designed for nearly instantaneous on/off, high-pressure/maximum velocity flow with little or no pressure drop (i.e., zero restriction).
But as any of you who have used actuated ball valves for any length of time knows, these valves are notoriously high maintenance - with relatively short lifetimes. Employing dynamic shutoff, with fluid pressure forcing the actual ball against the valve’s seat creating the seal that prevents fluid flow, an actuated ball valve’s seals experience significant wear and tear.
Seal Degradation
As a ball valve is repeatedly opened and closed, its seals (typically of Teflon), constantly rub against the valve’s inner surfaces and over time wear down. Add particulate-laden water flowing through the valve, and the seals scratch and wear that much faster. Eventually, the seals fail and start to leak, necessitating costly, time-consuming maintenance and downtime.
Under perfect conditions, you can expect up to 100,000 cycles from an actuated ball valve. But if you’re dealing with “dirty” steam or water, you can expect this to be shortened significantly. The combination of the particulate-laden steam/water and very high temperatures can quickly degrade valve seals and other components, often limiting ball valve life in these scenarios to only a week or two.
Yielding to Alternatives
To overcome the ball valve’s shortcomings - while retaining key ball valve benefits - manufacturers have experimented with other valve designs. One of the most successful of these is the Y-pattern or angle isolation valve, which Burkert introduced in 1991. Scores of other valve manufacturers have come out with their own versions in the years since.