Figure 3. The central driving unit connects the software to the high-power ultrasound transducers.
To avoid this expensive mechanical cleaning cycle that requires taking the heat exchanger off from the process for a week, an ultrasonic cleaning system was designed and installed on the equipment. In fouling prevention mode, the cleaning system runs continuously on a low power setting and keeps the heat exchanger running efficiently all the time.
“In fouling prevention mode, the cleaning system runs continuously on a low power setting and keeps the heat exchanger running efficiently all the time.”
Two sonorods were designed specifically to be assembled to the heat exchanger and were tailor-made by a mechanics supplier. The sonorods were attached to the inlet pipe of the heat exchanger. Power electronics and proprietary software paired with power ultrasonic transducers attached to the sonorods were used to generate and guide a sound field into the heat exchanger to keep it clean.
When the heat exchanger ran for more than 10 weeks and no sonication was implemented, it was considerably fouled, and the pressure difference between heat exchanger’s inlet and outlet pipes was over 2 Bars in the worst case (see Table 1). After continuous ultrasound fouling prevention was applied, the mean pressure difference stayed at 1.5 Bar during a five-week sonication period.
To run the process most efficiently, the pressure difference needs to stay under 1.5 Bar and preferably under 1 Bar. Mechanical cleaning was therefore carried out on the heat exchanger. After the mechanical cleaning, the mean pressure difference stayed at 0.5 Bar for a five-week sonication period, indicating that continuous ultrasonic fouling prevention was able to prevent the heat exchanger from getting fouled.